Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

Energy Update

lord henley: My Rt hon friend the Minister of State for Energy and Clean Growth (Claire Perry) has today made the following statement:On 15 November 2018 the General Court of the Court of Justice of the European Union found in favour of Tempus Energy, against the European Commission, removing the Commission’s State aid approval for the UK Capacity Market. The Court held that the Commission should have consulted more fully before granting State aid approval in 2014.This judgment was decided on procedural grounds. It was not a challenge to the nature of the UK Capacity Market mechanism itself.The judgment removes State aid approval for the Capacity Market, preventing the UK Government from holding any capacity auctions or making any capacity payments under existing agreements until re-approval.National Grid has confirmed that they do not believe the judgment will cause any risk to security of supply this winter. They have informed market participants of the judgement.We are considering the judgment in detail alongside the European Commission and are working to support them as they consider the legal options available.We believe the Capacity Market is an effective mechanism that is designed in such a way as to minimise costs to consumers. The design of the Capacity Market has not been called into question, and our focus is therefore on ensuring it can be reinstated as soon as possible.As part of this, we are seeking immediate State aid approval for a T-1 auction that will cover winter 2019/20. Alongside this, we are working to reinstate the full Capacity Market regime and are discussing the swiftest means of doing so with the Commission.The Government and National Grid will ensure that market participants are kept updated.I will keep the House updated as appropriate.


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS1090

Department for Education

Student finance update

viscount younger of leckie: My honourable friend the Minister of State for Universities, Science, Research and Innovation (Sam Gyimah) has made the following written ministerial statement.The Higher Education and Research Act 2017 received Royal Assent on 27 April 2017. It set out significant reforms to help ensure that students receive value for money from their investment in higher education. The Act included a power for the Government to set specific annual fee amounts for accelerated degree courses in Regulations.An accelerated degree is the equivalent of a standard degree in every sense but one: it is completed one year sooner than its standard equivalent. By studying for more weeks each year and taking shorter breaks between terms, accelerated students can, for example, complete the full content of a three-year degree - but graduate in two years.In spite of the many benefits, there are currently very few accelerated degree courses available, as the current fee limit creates a financial disincentive for Higher Education providers. Accelerated degrees cost more to deliver each year than their standard equivalents because of the higher number of weeks taught each year. Providers, however, can only charge up to the maximum annual fee cap for each year of teaching, regardless of the comparative volume of teaching delivered each year.During the passage of the 2017 Act, the Government agreed to consult on values for specific accelerated degree fee caps, with the aim of removing the financial barrier and incentivising wider provision. Our consultation proposed a 20% uplift in the annual tuition fee for accelerated degrees.For example, the annual tuition fee for a two-year accelerated course at a TEF-rated, fee-capped university (that is, a university with an approved access and participation plan and high level quality rating) would be capped at £11,100 per year, compared with £9,250 per year for the same course taught over three years.The total fee cost would be £22,200 for the accelerated degree, compared with £27,750 for the standard equivalent – for students, a 20% saving in tuition costs. The £22,200 total revenue for universities offers providers £3,700 more per accelerated degree (80% of the three year fee), compared with the current £18,500 maximum (67% of the three-year fee) that they can currently charge for the same two-year course.Today the Government is publishing its response to the accelerated degrees consultation, setting out our intention to proceed with Regulations to set the new accelerated degree fee caps as soon as possible, subject to Parliamentary approval. The full text of the response can be found on Gov.uk.These proposals apply to England only. We will also review the impact of the introduction of accelerated degrees fee caps three years after implementation. Our intention is to also bring forward Regulations providing for increased loan amounts for accelerated degree courses.This announcement will give providers confidence that the arrangements for accelerated courses are here to stay, and are consistent with all types of current non-accelerated fee levels and caps. The higher annual fee cap for accelerated degrees will drive up provision of accelerated courses across a far greater range of providers. Wider provision will in turn offer many more students the choice of applying for an accelerated course in their preferred subject and provider.The new accelerated degree fee cap is consistent with the Government’s overall ambitions for diverse and flexible post 18 education, currently being developed through the ongoing Review of post 18 education and funding.


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS1091

TEF reviewer appointment

viscount younger of leckie: My honourable friend the Minister of State for Universities, Science, Research and Innovation (Sam Gyimah) has made the following written ministerial statement.I am pleased to announce today that the Secretary of State for Education has appointed Dame Shirley Pearce DBE to report on the operation of the Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework (TEF) in line with the process set out in section 26 of the Higher Education and Research Act 2017.The Review will commence in December this year and we expect the reviewer to report in summer 2019.Dame Shirley has a distinguished track record in higher education and has made an outstanding contribution to a number of other areas of public life.This makes her an excellent choice to lead this Review and clearly shows that she will command the confidence of HE providers.I will place a copy of her detailed biography in the House Libraries.Further details and guidance will be published on .gov.uk.


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS1089

Department of Health and Social Care

National Cervical Screening Programme Incident

lord o'shaughnessy: My hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Public Health and Primary Care (Steve Brine) has made the following written statement:I am today informing the house of a serious incident relating to the ‘call and recall’ process administered by Primary Care Support England (PCSE), a service provided by Capita on behalf of NHS England as part of the national cervical cancer screening programme.The NHS cervical cancer screening programme saves an estimated 5,000 lives a year by detecting abnormalities of the cervix early and referring women for effective treatment. It is offered to women aged 25 to 49 every three years and those aged 50 to 64 every five years.On 17 October, NHS England and Public Health England were informed by Capita that a number of cervical screening invitation and reminder letters had not been sent to women inviting them to make a routine cervical screening appointment. Following further urgent investigation of this incident since then, I can now confirm that between January and June 2018, 43,220 women did not receive one or other of these letters and, in a very small minority of cases, neither the invitation nor reminder. In addition, Capita has also informed us that, between January and October 2018, a further 4,508 women were not sent letters informing them of the result of their cervical screening.In light of this, NHS England declared this as a serious incident and set up a clinically-led multiagency incident panel including PCSE, Public Health England and NHS Digital on 23 October 2018 to assess any risk or harm to the women affected. The panel has put in place actions to assess and mitigate any risk as well as care and support where needed. Daily audits are now in place to ensure all women’s files are accounted for, and the panel are looking closely with Capita at how parts of the process could be automated to reduce errors.Capita has confirmed that this incident was caused by files from their call and recall operations team not being correctly sent and uploaded to Capita’s print and despatch service between January and October 2018. Capita has accepted full responsibility for this incident and has apologised for it.For the majority of the 4,508 women who did not receive their result letter, their result was normal. However, 182 women had a result that required a follow-up test (colposcopy) and 252 women needed an early repeat screening test. In most instances, where the screening result requires further tests or treatments, the laboratory will usually refer the woman directly to a colposcopy clinic independently of the woman receiving her result letter from Capita. For women needing early repeat testing, their GP routinely follows up these tests. However, to make sure all women needing a colposcopy or an early repeat test are being managed correctly, every woman’s screening record is being checked to ensure they have been referred appropriately. No harm has been identified to date.Capita has made a public apology and has written to all the women who did not receive invitation or reminder letters and to those who did not get their normal result letter. Letters and apologies are being sent to all women who have not been referred for colposcopy or who have not had the required follow up screening test. In addition, the GPs of women affected have been informed so they can offer support to their patients.The results of the screening and further tests on all women affected by this incident will be monitored over time to ensure any impact is followed up.In addition to reviewing the checks in place around file transfer and checking the number of files processed, sent, printed and dispatched, Capita has produced a briefing for staff and proposed additional automation to the process to remove manual steps that may have contributed to this incident.Our priority is patient safety and we will be assembling a clinical board that will provide oversight for the cervical screening call and recall service. This will ensure that every part of the process has an in-depth review.NHS England is also undertaking an independent expert review of their screening programmes.Government continues to closely monitor the performance of all our suppliers and to implement improvement plans where necessary. Officials are working with Capita to ensure that the process recommendations and lessons learned from this issue are applied to similar services across Capita's public sector contracts.Incidents of this type are not only unacceptable in terms of the impact they have on the women affected, but they also undermine public confidence in our screening programmes as a whole.


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS1086